home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail
- From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
- Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- Date: 12 Apr 1996 13:34:16 -0700
- Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Message-ID: <4kmeo8INN4gd@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <4kkru5INN71j@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca
-
- In article <4km8el$3he@nntp.Stanford.EDU>,
- Chuck Karish <karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
- >Neither POSIX.1-1990 nor FIPS 151-2 requires that a conforming
- >system support the POSIX.1 general terminal interface. Windows
- >NT 3.51 does not do so.
-
- Right. And the ANSI/ISO C standard doesn't require that a program that has more
- than one instance of an object that is 32K long be translated by a conforming
- implementation.
- --
-
-